Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

kjmajo t1_j59si9u wrote

A very important thing to keep in mind when talking about hydrogen is that is only more sustainable if produced using renewables, which is less than 0.1% of current hydrogen production. If it is produced with fossil fuels, which 99.9 % of it is, it is worse for the environment than burning coal, or conventional jet fuel, for the same energy. https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/08/blue-hydrogen-pushed-by-gas-companies-harms-climate-more-than-coal-study-says/

2

PartsWork t1_j5a5k3t wrote

Thanks for the interesting read. I suspect it's the effect of nascent technologies, like transistors being more expensive than vacuum tubes at first, and printing presses being more expensive than quills and inkwells.

Further reading from the EPA about the methods of production and the emissions data for motor-vehicle use. EPA says about 95% is produced by reclamation from natural gas, so if it was 99.9% before it's growing exponentially, which is what we can hope for as non-grid production technologies are developed. Last point is that the ArsTechnica article only discusses one type of hydrogen fuel augmentation being used in one (massive) sector. The uplifting news is that in the foreseeable future, only antiques will use vacuum tubes fossil fuels.

3