Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Ma1eficent t1_j5bpuin wrote

Reply to comment by Hondaccord in WA lawmakers propose bill requiring clergy to report child abuse by littleblackcar

Just means it will be thrown out as violating religious freedom.

16

Hondaccord t1_j5bt4xc wrote

Confessional privilege still exists so I don’t think you’re correct.

8

Ma1eficent t1_j5cbpw6 wrote

They amended it to require even if confessed.

6

Hondaccord t1_j5cd2gy wrote

They amended it to require clergy to report child abuse when admitted to in confession, like I said, but clergy are still exempt from testifying in court.

3

Ma1eficent t1_j5cg7xa wrote

Requiring to report breaks the vow just as testifying in court does.

6

Hondaccord t1_j5dcpo0 wrote

The vow and the law are two different things, idk what to tell you

4

Ma1eficent t1_j5qnz8c wrote

Well in this country the first amendment says the government can't make laws that prohibit practice of a religion. And confession and its protection is a pretty big part of Christianity. There's just no way it survives a legal challenge on first amendment grounds.

2

Hondaccord t1_j5qvbbt wrote

Just like every other constitutional right there are limitations.

2

littleblackcar OP t1_j5cxg9y wrote

One could make the argument that the rights of the child to be safe from abusive caretakers outweigh any religious liberty rights of the adult(s) in these situations.

8