Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

EllipsisMark t1_iubps1z wrote

Reply to comment by AutoModerator in [WP] You sit before the UN, arms crossed as they question you. Finally, you speak up. "Unless you can find the exact page of the Geneva Convention that makes dropping werewolves into enemy territory illegal, I am free to go." by TerrWolf

Okay, so, the geneva convention is actually the geneva conventions(plural) and it's really wordy and spread across like 12 documents, but I'm pretty sure the wounds caused by werewolf fangs and claws would be considered a violation. Additionally, if the werewolf curse spreads that's definitely a violation and if they spread any other disease that's definitely a violation.

24

SufficientThroat5781 t1_iubx8j4 wrote

Your completely right, I just got to ask first, do they use dogs in war ? If they do then I think claws and fangs might be negated, just might be. Cause if they count as weapons then yeah, stabbing weapons that inflicts more pain then death, so it is a violation

9

EllipsisMark t1_iuc1dyn wrote

I think there might be a distinction between using dogs to search and capture and just letting them maul a limb of. Like my great grandpa use to always say "If the cops do it, then it's probably a war crime."

7