Submitted by Oheligud t3_11pm5bs in askscience
Exciting_Telephone65 t1_jbzdcz4 wrote
Reply to comment by ChromaticDragon in As they still have a neutral charge, can antineutrons replace neutrons in a regular atom? by Oheligud
>Trouble is that you have to keep it separated from regular matter
I'm now imagining a wooden cupboard at the lab with a piece of paper on it saying ONLY ANTIMATTER HERE
auraseer t1_jbzysa8 wrote
Then you get some bored grad student who doesn't read the signs, goes to put a liter jar of antineutrons in the wrong cabinet, and causes a massive explosion that destroys half the continent.
ElReptil t1_jc1vqqh wrote
>and causes a massive explosion that destroys half the continent
That kind of depends on how many antineutrons are actually in a liter jar, which I guess could be anywhere from a handful in a magnetic trap to a chunk with the density of nuclear matter.
Fun fact: the energy released by the annihilation of one liter of antimatter at that density (roughly a hundred billion tons) is weirdly close to the gravitational binding energy of Earth.
[deleted] t1_jc1rphs wrote
[removed]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments