jon_hendry t1_je76ti4 wrote
JWST sees in infrared, not microwave, so while it can “see further into the past” it can’t directly measure the CMB, which is microwaves.
yofomojojo OP t1_je89pto wrote
Yeah, I'm realizing I have two contradicting notions in my head about that now. Is there still some sort of mapping being done, by any other name than CMB though? That thing we were all excited for a peak of about how the universe X billion years ago was shaped?
Sharlinator t1_je9ldkl wrote
JWST is a narrow-field instrument, so it’s ill suited for survey type tasks; it would take an extremely long time to map some appreciable fraction of the sky, and anyway parts of the sky are out of its reach because of the need to remain behind the sunshade. But the NGRST, due to launch in 2026 or 2027, is designed specifically for surveys in visible light/near infrared. Its field of view is approximately the angular size of the full moon, which is an area about 100x larger than that of Hubble or JWST. Mapping the whole sky at that level of detail would still require a couple hundred thousand separate exposures!
jarlrmai2 t1_je8uslz wrote
Maybe the SQA ground based radio telescope?
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments