Submitted by XComhghall t3_zzpl96 in askscience
deviantbono t1_j2fenc8 wrote
Reply to comment by Tabbeber in If fish accumulate mercury in the more toxic, methylmercury form, is it toxic to them? by XComhghall
Why not be sure before commenting? Bioaccumulation in large predators like tuna is a big problem, as the commenter stated. The benefits (general wellbeing) does not outweigh risks (paralysis and death) of a high-tuna diet. A mercury-consious fish diet can be healthy tho.
Tabbeber t1_j2fhkz0 wrote
You're correct, I should have been sure before commenting.
The intention of my comment was that, although seafood contains a non-insignificant amount of mercury (and other toxins), one should not be afraid of eating fish regularly.
The most recent study I could find found no evidence of developmental harm among children with high seafood diet mothers.
Syzygy_Stardust t1_j2fsxld wrote
Uh, as a sterile man, my concerns over mercury poisoning isn't toward my future babies, but my current brain.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments