Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Typical-Radish4317 t1_j9fssvy wrote

It's why the city shouldn't let people sit on vacants and should absolutely have programs that keep people in houses. Making cosmetic changes is a heck of a lot cheaper than a complete tear down

3

DoNotWeepAtMyGrave t1_j9g1h5x wrote

There are 14,000 vacants in Baltimore. You’d expect the city to front the cost to repair them? It costs $15k to demolish them and $100k to make them habitable.

Say hello to doubled taxes…

0