Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DudleyAndStephens t1_ja9zzqg wrote

Maybe an actual lawyer could chime in but I imagine that would be a liability nightmare for the city.

59

erfranklin13 t1_jaajbhm wrote

Not a lawyer, but work in insurance. Can confirm it would be a liability nightmare

33

tustinjucker t1_jacrhcq wrote

If set up correctly, it would fall under Maryland's recreational use statute, which would mean that the city would only be liable if it injured someone through the willful or malicious failure to guard or warn of a dangerous condition. And they could have people sign waivers.

7