Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

DfcukinLite t1_jaab7py wrote

That’s why liability waivers our thing

−8

EfficiencySuch6361 t1_jaacfok wrote

Can have 1,000,000 waivers per participant but they can still sue, and would need to go to court with a lawyer. Also no insurance company is going to work with them, or only offer skyhigh rates. It is a seemingly good idea on surface level but even a tiny exploration of its general execution leads to very obvious problems

11

DfcukinLite t1_jaaerif wrote

People are always going to try and get over whenever they think they can get away with it, but, it doesn’t mean it’s going to happen or that it can’t be done

−5

EfficiencySuch6361 t1_jaagjja wrote

Practically anything can be done with enough resources thrown at it but that doesn’t mean that it should be done. Simply being possible does not automatically make it a good idea

6

DfcukinLite t1_jaah2in wrote

Being as it’s been done before in other places (Cleveland and been talked about doing something similar in others, it’s worth the trying. Clearly it’s a good idea.

−3

EfficiencySuch6361 t1_jaakrz7 wrote

Never happened in Cleveland didn’t even get started

9

Douseigh t1_jabyx0g wrote

You don’t ride obviously. Dirt biking legally at parks is a hobby id have trouble affording at my salary. It’s close to owning a small boat

5