Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

greenisthecolour11 t1_jdb0b7a wrote

Exactly. Starbucks isn’t a charity. It’d be very generous of them to allow the public to use their bathrooms, but people aren’t entitled to them. I don’t understand the logic people use to justify opinions like the one you replied to.

9

Kraqrjack t1_jdb21mm wrote

Also there was a thread on Reddit about a guy who chose to live in his car. He was a coder or something, choosing to be homeless. Traveled from Starbucks to Starbucks to use the wi-fi. Bought food, sat there all day, used the bathroom, and did this consistently. So being homeless and even transient is not the issue. Spend money. Private entities should not be forced to pick up the slack for failed government.

As a taxpayer I’d certainly endorse public shithouses on every corner. Other countries have them.

10