Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

UnrealSquare t1_iqw3rv6 wrote

Though trails like this can, and certainly would, also be used for non-recreation purposes, recreation is important.

10

roccoccoSafredi t1_iqwm1nx wrote

It is. But the entire purpose of it is to link two trails that already exist for recreational purposes.

−5

UnrealSquare t1_iqwome2 wrote

And there is nothing wrong with that. Trying to get from one to the other now is pretty difficult without driving.

7

roccoccoSafredi t1_iqwp3kb wrote

Then drive.

−5

UnrealSquare t1_iqwpk0e wrote

Not everyone has a car (something like ~30% of Baltimore city residents) or wants to contribute to pollution and congestion for recreation. Why are you so against something that will benefit both city and county residents by giving them another option to travel back and forth between the two that doesn't impact those who choose to drive?

10

roccoccoSafredi t1_iqwqwc8 wrote

I'm not so against it. I just want people to have some perspective on stuff like this.

1