Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

todareistobmore t1_iuakera wrote

He's not wrong, but maybe a more balanced way to put it is that the Patagonia guy's doing the same thing RW billionaires do to... :gestures at everything:, and on basic level there's a real value difference there.

Every billionaire is a policy failure, but some billionaires are less bad than others.

2

buttpincher t1_iuausig wrote

The smug remark of “Source: A YouTube video” really pissed me off. As if you can’t find MIT lectures on YouTube or deep dives into many subject matters by experts

−2

todareistobmore t1_iub1t9v wrote

Well, even though Adam Conover's generally good, the video's 20 minutes long! It would take significantly less time to find a decent link, send somebody that link, and have them read it.

Otherwise, while the glow up is bigly cringe, if you want to drag Pa Tagonia (...Pat Agonia?), I think Barre Seid (tbf I had to google this) really should be mentioned too. The difference between complicity and abuse matters even when it comes to billionaires.

1

buttpincher t1_iub2av8 wrote

I get what you're saying but he covers Patagonia right away in the video it's not like you'd have to scroll to find a mention.

−1

todareistobmore t1_iubpwg8 wrote

But it would still involve clicking play on a video with a runtime of 20 minutes and ...hard pass, personally speaking.

1

buttpincher t1_iubv3lq wrote

Understandable attention spans are in seconds these days

0

todareistobmore t1_iubznve wrote

I have no idea what the point of that dig is, but be honest: does it work for you offline?

2

buttpincher t1_iuc13dy wrote

There is no dig...? Its true people's attention span is short no thanks to TikTok and the like. Im agreeing with you

0