Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

todareistobmore t1_iye2tun wrote

Reply to comment by moderndukes in Baltimore City Board of Ethics says new pension bill presents conflict of interest by contra_account

Agree by and large, but re: (2) this bill doesn't change the pension payout, just when people become eligible for it.

2

moderndukes t1_iyeate8 wrote

I would still argue it’s better than giving former officer holders absolutely no pension. It also might not be legal for them to amend the size of their own pensions - I know for Congress, when they change their pay rates, it takes effect for the next Congress not the current.

Plus, what’s being missing in all the analysis here on Reddit is it’s changing it from 12 years to 8 years. It’s a reduction of a single term, and aligns with the new term limits.

Overall, it’s people freaking out over something that’s logical and not super corrupt, and that freak out only plays into the hands of those trying to further fuck up our government.

−3

howsguess t1_iyednb0 wrote

I was one of the ones screaming the nerve of them too.I'm not a fan,but Moseby has a point.

−2