Submitted by PangeanPrawn t3_10xnbq2 in books
cliff_smiff t1_j7vh9p1 wrote
Reply to comment by icarusrising9 in Why do some books blank out arbitrary place names? by PangeanPrawn
Why were true accounts at the time censored?
Edit- I still don't get why a city name would be withheld. Names, addresses, etc. sure those make sense. Are the place names in fiction imitating place names in true accounts being censored? Were other kinds of information censored in true accounts instead? What kind of things are the true accounts, like newspaper articles or something else like an autobiography?
jenh6 t1_j7vhys7 wrote
It’s to protect privacy at the time. The same way certain court cases don’t reveal names
icarusrising9 t1_j7vimh9 wrote
It's just like when faces are censored in today's media, or a reporter doesn't give sources' names. It's identifying information.
bluesam3 t1_j7wsp4b wrote
You're overestimating the size of the places being hidden: at this point, first name and town might well be enough to allow people to identify your address, and certainly town plus whatever other information was in the thing being censored would be.
cliff_smiff t1_j7wu4du wrote
Thanks that makes sense
Cronerburger t1_j7vomzk wrote
SPC risks
[deleted] t1_j7wj3a0 wrote
Gdpr
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments