Submitted by Ill_Definition8074 t3_127w8cn in books
I'm asking this question because I remembered a conversation I had with my brother years ago where he said Lord of the Flies was about toxic masculinity. I had read the book in high school and I didn't agree with his interpretation but thinking back on it now I wonder if the story would go the same way if the plane that crashed on the island had both boys and girls instead of just boys (there actually is a Filipino film version of the story which has a mixed gender group of castaways). In my opinion it would happen the same because I think the story's themes about the breakdown of civilization, the destruction of social order, paranoia leading to violence transcend gender. Women along with men have been involved in violent acts in all of history. For example some of the most violent acts of the French Revolution were lead by women. So I think things would've gone pretty much the same if the story featured both boys and girls.
A quick google search reveals I'm not the first to consider this point. So what do you think about this? Would things go different or would they stay the same if both boys and girls were stranded on the island in Lord of the Flies?
MorriganJade t1_jeg3kh8 wrote
I believe Golding said that he didn't put girls in because he didn't want to add sexuality, which is in itself wrong I think because sexuality can be gay as well. Personally I believe that given the assumption that kids would do that, then they would do it in a mixed group as well