Submitted by hater_first t3_y9ugcr in books
_BlueFire_ t1_it7fyjk wrote
To keep it realistic: what groups do you think would have the smallest chance surviving in a post-apocalyptic, resource-lacking environment? Obviously those who are already facing difficulties and are already oppressed and discriminated. /s
Seriously, though, I second what other comments said: it's probably just the result of authors not thinking about minorities. Not on purpose, just what happens when you don't have to think about something
bofh000 t1_it7gvzd wrote
I would venture to guess in a true post-apocalyptic setting the people better set to survive would be the ones who have been used to harsh conditions for generations.
_BlueFire_ t1_it7k5wr wrote
Good point
theworldsucksbigA t1_it7jj5u wrote
There's a very big difference between "harsh" conditions and a post-apocalyptic world. Atleast in america those that would have a higher chance of surviving would be those who already live off grid, the average american wouldn't be able to last a month off grid without having to run to a store to buy food or whatnot.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments