krokett-t t1_j6gu7v5 wrote
AI can be trained on a huge number of art and can simulate the style of an author/poet. However AI can't create their own art, they can only create derivative art. Even than as the AI doesn't understand what's it's doing it'll likely have nonsensical parts, especially if it's a longer work. So it's basically creates glorified fanart.
If AI can reach general intelligence, so it actually understands what it's doing, then it can create new art. That said it's questionable if AI can reach general intelligence (it is possible, but not 100% sure) and if it reaches it, than when will it be.
general-dc t1_j6jf9ib wrote
Isn't all art derivative in some form or fashion?
krokett-t t1_j6jimtb wrote
I would say all stories (or almost all stories) have recurring elements or archetypes, however I wouldn't say all of them are derivative. Many of the greatest stories written have an amalgamation of more than one such archetype or said element is shown from different angle.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments