writethefuture3 OP t1_ixitlvk wrote
Should remove all height limits, lot setbacks, and "historic" designations. Let land owners build what they want.
SteamingHotChocolate t1_ixiz4oo wrote
>Let land owners build what they want.
This will not work out the way you think it will
itsonlyastrongbuzz t1_ixixiip wrote
The solution to one extreme is seldom the other extreme, it’s moderation.
charons-voyage t1_ixj02zm wrote
This is Reddit, if you aren’t proposing to eat the rich and build a bike lane out of their remains then it’s gonna get downvoted.
[deleted] t1_ixji6b7 wrote
[deleted]
3720-To-One t1_ixjeslh wrote
Right, and part of that moderation is making zoning far more loose and less restrictive within residential zones.
Give developers far more freedom to meet the soaring demand.
itsonlyastrongbuzz t1_ixjkczo wrote
Less restrictive, absolutely!
Not total abolishment; some libertarian pipe dream of “build anything you want anywhere and it’ll just sort itself out.”
partyorca t1_ixjxvby wrote
Having been to Houston recently, holy shit the laissez-faire approach to building just whatever wherever does not end well. Gross place.
IC_Design t1_ixj4wsq wrote
You sound like a NIMBY
SergeantThunderCock t1_ixjbtlm wrote
Moderation was defined in the Republic as the act of balancing between competing needs. Right now, the need for cheaper housing is overwhelming. Thoughtful moderates are not supporting NIMBY policies.
IC_Design t1_ixjgcqp wrote
NIMBYs disguise under the name of moderacy to prevent anything from getting built
RoaminRonin13 t1_ixj8bhx wrote
None of the three things you listed are why people aren’t building more residential.
writethefuture3 OP t1_ixjsdrv wrote
They all are.
Efficient-Future786 t1_ixjj4hi wrote
That ain't it, if anything we should be enforcing those rules more than we currently do. We absolutely have enough land to fix the housing crisis with just mid-density buildings and the premium for a more livable city is worth it. Boston should look to Paris for inspiration, not New York City.
The real answer is to upzone large swaths of land near public transit to allow for 5-6 story housing with first floor retail, aka what literally everyone wants. Try walking along Beacon Street from the public garden to Coolidge Corner for example, it's one of the densest housing corridors in the state but it feels extremely livable, on account of setbacks, rules for architectural styles, and limits to around 6 stories. Upzoning neighborhoods like Mission Hill, Allston, Cambridgeport, Central Square, and Kendall Square to this style would put a massive dent into housing demand and create ideal urban life.
Sure, build a few high rises in central districts, but too many of those just aren't desirable. Downtown Boston is about to renovate a bunch of former office towers to housing anyways and that should fill most of the demand for that particular kind of housing.
[deleted] t1_ixjpo5b wrote
[deleted]
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments