Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

Proof-Variation7005 t1_j1zx9xb wrote

I'd agree that it could benefit the city but it is still a concession to the union in this negotiation. If one sider wants that change more, you don't just give it without getting something in return.

3

2old4badbeer t1_j202wi4 wrote

I agree. But if the city wants reform, they have to understand negotiation, too. The Globe can’t just say “it is negotiation, after all,” when it comes to BPPA’s stance on the residency and the city’s reluctance to drop the requirement and paint BPPA as stubborn in the same breath. It goes both ways. Nothing is free for both sides.

5