JohnArce t1_j4dngmp wrote on January 14, 2023 at 11:48 PM

Reply to comment by PM_WHAT_Y0U_G0T in "nt|tld", made by xrev_v (me) by xrev_v

digital art =/= AI art. I'll admit that I don't understand why it being digital makes it "even cooler", as a physical process and object is more impressive to me but if OP made this digital image themselves, that's still pretty good work.

Valdearg20 t1_j4e0a1r wrote on January 15, 2023 at 1:18 AM

I don't have any proof, but this feeeeeeelllllss AI generated. If they did indeed make it themselves, good on them because it is indeed pretty cool, but I'm honestly skeptical.

I hate that we've gotten to the point where we can't be sure if someone poured their heart and soul and skill and time into a piece or if they just typed a prompt into a text box any more. Really feels like it cheapens everything.

Edit: leaving this up for context, but I no longer feel like it's AI work. My apologies for not digging deeper.

LitLitten t1_j4ezucw wrote on January 15, 2023 at 6:02 AM

Why is it preferable to take the energy required to make a typed out post discrediting artwork when a click to check their post history is both more efficient and simpler?

Valdearg20 t1_j4f0ig9 wrote on January 15, 2023 at 6:10 AM

For what it's worth, I agree with your statement, looking back on it. It was a comment made quickly between trying to cook dinner.

That said, I think it reinforces the point I made in the second paragraph. It sucks hard that those doubts even crept into my head, or that a deep dive into someone's other posts is now required to be confident somebody actually put time, effort, skill, and passion into a piece.

My apologies to the artist for being doubtful in the first place.

MrPWAH t1_j4eusyx wrote on January 15, 2023 at 5:12 AM

If you look at their other work it's pretty obvious their stuff is just digital 3D. Their style is fairly consistent and I could see how they'd render out this type of thing in Maya or Blender.