Submitted by whjkhn t3_1234dfr in dataisbeautiful
Comments
Roborob2000 t1_jdtoc9n wrote
As a colourblind person, personally it's much better than someone who decides to use colours and doesn't care to use high contrasted colours
420galaxy t1_jdu9f4u wrote
This is a great point!!! <3
Green_is_best t1_jdue8sw wrote
I mean grading is good for continuous data right? Theres no need to discretize as you would loose information Or do mean mean a single colour grading rather than two/three colour grading?
420galaxy t1_je2hqtl wrote
For me its simply easier to differentiate the data. I struggle seeing and matching differences between a single colour gradient versus data shown in a colour scale but dtata is connected to separate colours. It would probably have helped if the scale itself was labeled with percentages.. Im beginning to think i have a processing disorder lol sorry guys
legacy535 t1_jdtsyhw wrote
Data may be beautiful, but this data Is wrong....
[deleted] t1_jdwb914 wrote
[removed]
BourboneAFCV t1_jdugrcz wrote
I'm colourblind, are we winning?
Cheap-Experience4147 t1_jdv0pw5 wrote
Not the best colors choice for a map
Time_Possibility4683 t1_jdtief6 wrote
Thanks for the link, I was surprised there was no data for NZ but it is in the table between the US and S Korea.
Same_Ad_1273 t1_jduara7 wrote
rip japan will miss you in the future
tilapios t1_jdumt00 wrote
What's with the copyright statement in the bottom right?
[deleted] t1_jdv2u0p wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jdv3lfk wrote
[removed]
miko2264 t1_jdtabm9 wrote
Seeing the low percentage in third world countries is very sobering to look at…. Really hammers home the point of how important our location is on our longevity
420galaxy t1_jdtibxg wrote
Is it just me that groans when people decide a gradient is better than differentiating colours?