Submitted by giteam t3_120km4f in dataisbeautiful
RelativeDoughnut6967 t1_jdi1jxf wrote
Originally I thought this said 53 physicians per 1000 In the US and I was really not liking my odds in the future
someguyonline00 t1_jdi5jjg wrote
How is 2.61 physicians better than 53, or did I misunderstand — genuinely curious
RelativeDoughnut6967 t1_jdibu2j wrote
Its not better In general, but it makes it seem like the job market is decreasing/full
BIGBUMPINFTW t1_jdivw5j wrote
Ok so you're referring to the job market as a potential future physician. That context would have been helpful.
RelativeDoughnut6967 t1_jdiwtb1 wrote
Yeah sorry, I realize it wasn't clear enough
DunderLubbin t1_jdi98qb wrote
53rd place
someguyonline00 t1_jdi9i2v wrote
Yeah, but they were concerned before they realized it was 53rd place, no? Not after?
IronFFlol t1_jdijnkm wrote
Yes if there’s 53/1000, that’s wayyy too high. That probably means that that job market for doctors is extremely saturated.
HappiHappiHappi t1_jdjvny7 wrote
Even at 53/1000 can still basically guarantee there'd be a shortage of GPs/family medicine drs. Too much work and not enough par compared to other specialities for most people, which is sad because it is the speciality that really is the most important and so many people could avoid seeing any other doctor if they received early, high quality primary care. For example my mother ended up in hospital for 4 days with a bladder infection because she couldn't get into the GP for 3 days before that so the infection had time to take hold.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments