Submitted by giteam t3_11wmpq4 in dataisbeautiful
[deleted] t1_jczmw11 wrote
[deleted]
snoosh00 t1_jczux8y wrote
Something something too big to fail.
TouchGrassRedditor t1_jd07rki wrote
Assets under management isn’t the same as ownership. The investors who own these funds could move them anywhere at any time
[deleted] t1_jd08e1l wrote
[deleted]
Real_Jackraps t1_jd0dmyi wrote
People smarter than you exist in case you haven't experienced it before.
[deleted] t1_jd14n9d wrote
[deleted]
TouchGrassRedditor t1_jd08qv7 wrote
You know that literally every economic sector and every possible risk profile is represented across the trillions that these firms manage, right? Blackrock doesn’t put 100% of its client’s assets into the same stock lmao, it’s small cap, mid cap, large cap, international, and everything else
chillord t1_jd084f6 wrote
Just from a semi-layman perspective: BlackRock is a company that's dishing out a ton of ETFs like the MSCI World. So they have these assets "in management" but actually just buy the underlying shares and earn management fees. There isn't really any risk involved for this type of business since it's 100% collaterized.
To gain a full perspective, we would need to see a diagram that explains in detail which asset classes are managed and how the percentages add up.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments