Submitted by haboo213 t3_xtr2ft in dataisbeautiful
ApprehensiveSorbet76 t1_iqw1cyz wrote
Reply to comment by r_a_d_ in [OC] Supersonic Inefficiency: Why the Concorde Was Decommissioned by haboo213
If you just want the numbers you should opt for the table of values. A graph adds value above and beyond a table because it enables visually derived insights into the differences and relationships between values. Physically skewing the visual characteristics of the graph can result in the visual derivation of false insights (Concourse appears to consume 10x more fuel when it really consumes 4x more).
r_a_d_ t1_iqw1r40 wrote
This graph provides plenty of visually derived insight, but not the specific one you chose.
ApprehensiveSorbet76 t1_iqw5hxa wrote
It's the specific insight the author chose, not me. If we focus on the regression line characteristics then its fine viewed like this. But a title like "Supersonic Inefficiency: Why the Concorde was Decommissioned" along with a red dot for the Concorde is intended to focus your attention on how inefficient the Concorde is relative to the others. In regards to the main point the author intended to convey, the graph is misleading.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments