Comments
hswerdfe_2 OP t1_is12l7v wrote
thanks for the feedback, I agree on the colors and the captions. The blank space at the start is because the graph goes from 0% to 100% I could make it go from 15% to 85% or something like that.
hswerdfe_2 OP t1_is0uyhl wrote
This was done 100% with R and the data source is located here https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=3710016302
[deleted] t1_is1ruay wrote
[removed]
dml997 t1_is2bkdj wrote
This is a really bad way to present this. A simple bar chart would be better. The independent variable, course of study, should be on the X axis. The light blue is hard to read. The font is way too small.
hswerdfe_2 OP t1_is443xq wrote
Thanks for the thoughtful comments I disagree. about the bar chart. I always felt grouped bar charts are not great ways of showing comparisons of data. I also disagree about flipping the axis. I always put the categorical value on the y-axis as it facilitates reading the text. But the points about the light blue and font are spot on.
EelgrassKelp t1_is0xl7c wrote
Hi, there. This is interesting information. I don't know if you had a choice with this siftware, but this would be easier to see and comprehend if you had used bolder colours, and more density in the captions, Also if you were to cut some of the blank space at the beginning beginning of the rows?
Still, a good subject matter.