Submitted by giteam t3_y3txle in dataisbeautiful
Street-Individual292 t1_isdn4m3 wrote
Reply to comment by slayer828 in [OC] Google IPO vs Now - breaking down revenue and profit sources by giteam
How is that sickening?
Ricksterdinium t1_isdwglj wrote
How is it not??
nworb200 t1_ise072k wrote
70% tax is sickening. Why even fucking bother?
AtrainUnjustlyBanned t1_ise5j2m wrote
I can think of $106M reasons
justheretoannoyyou t1_isedxuo wrote
what did the state do that justifies taking 241M from someone else?
AtrainUnjustlyBanned t1_isev5sq wrote
Lol I am a libertarian I'm not going to defend ridiculous tax levels
I am just saying saying "what's the point is quite the exaggeration.
[deleted] t1_isephwo wrote
[deleted]
Street-Individual292 t1_isfsru1 wrote
Because their reported effective tax rate isn’t the rate they actually pay. The large difference between the two rates mainly come from the way they have to report stock compensation
slayer828 t1_isekfca wrote
70% is too much, 16% is too little. Why should they pay less taxes than the middle class.
The company SHOULD pay more in taxes then the workers who make the billions.
garygoblins t1_iselz0y wrote
While I agree corporations don't pay quite enough, people actually don't pay more than this. The vast majority pay a much lower effective tax rate.
"The Tax Foundation derives an average tax rate of 14.6% for the top 50% of taxpayers, just 3.4% for the bottom 50%, and an average of 13.3% overall."
Street-Individual292 t1_isepnng wrote
They’re not paying less tax than the middle class. Corporate effective tax rates are calculated very differently than individual rates
A rate of 16% doesn’t actually mean they’re paying 16% of their profit in tax
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments