Submitted by Inevitable-Clue9840 t3_ye0gv2 in dataisbeautiful
Comments
interstellargator t1_itv7woy wrote
It's a little ambiguous whether higher numbers mean more protein or more fat (convention would dictate protein but clarification would be good practice). Units would also be useful on that axis. Weight ratio, calorie ratio, or stoichiometric ratio?
Also pine nuts aren't a tree nut (nor indeed a nut at all). Likewise macadamia.
________76________ t1_itvbb2r wrote
Pea nut, hazle nut, cashew nut...
edit: not many Best In Show fans here I see
[deleted] t1_itvbimg wrote
[deleted]
interstellargator t1_itvbunm wrote
They aren't nuts at all, let alone tree nuts. If you're also allergic to pine nuts that's as much of a coincidence as you being allergic to butternut squash or nutmeg.
Inevitable-Clue9840 OP t1_itvpha5 wrote
Thanks for the feedback on the axis. Really wasn't sure of the best way to phrase that.
ooru t1_itvwysh wrote
Almond nut, pecan nut, pistachio nut...
We just putting "nut" after words? What's the game, here?
NewDeviceNewUsername t1_itwzrv6 wrote
Are we botanists, or people eating food? Because I think we're talking normal human definition of "nut".
lol
interstellargator t1_itwzx0a wrote
Then where's peanut? Coconut?
el_kabong909 t1_itxdee8 wrote
Well, if we are going by the botanical definition then almonds, pistachios, walnuts, cashews, pecans, and brazil nuts are also not nuts.
teady_bear t1_itzkrwd wrote
Are you nuts? I agree though at least peanut should be here.
interstellargator t1_itzom62 wrote
Well I'm not on the list so we must conclude I'm not.
Amorougen t1_itzw28e wrote
Peanuts grow "under" a ground plant, not on a tree.
Inevitable-Clue9840 OP t1_itv48f9 wrote
Source: nuthealth.org
Tools: Excel, Word