Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

jesssquirrel t1_ivx9sut wrote

Reply to comment by [deleted] in [OC] Who Targets You? Top Contested Facebook & Instagram Ad Audiences in US 2022 midterms by fabiofavusmaximus

>Saying it on Reddit doesn’t make it true.

🤯🤯🤯

Do go on with your proof then.

0

PaigePossum t1_ivxiomu wrote

I don't have definitive proof like that but observationally, cities are (on average) wealthier and more likely to vote Democrat than rural areas.

1

jesssquirrel t1_ivz33fo wrote

Wealthier areas are more democratic, wealthier individuals are more republican. Kind of a brain-hurty paradox, I'll admit, but it's true. Jonathan Haidt is a place to start googling if you want to read more. I can't remember the full explanation for the democratic areas thing, but the wealthier people in those areas are more republican for 2 obvious reasons: the better things are going for you, the less you think things need to change; and the Republicans resist all changes except tax cuts for the rich.

1

[deleted] t1_ivxbpj9 wrote

Proof of what?

That urban financial professionals tend to vote Democrat? And that they tend to earn more money than rural workers who feel the need to research personal finance online?

Do you have a point here?

0

jesssquirrel t1_ivxengg wrote

... Proof of the things you claimed were provably false

1

[deleted] t1_ivxev81 wrote

Oh I thought we were just being contrarian for the sake of it. Nothing about your original comment screamed “logical“ or “in good faith” or “relevant”.

2

jesssquirrel t1_ivxs1ru wrote

If you thought I was being that terrible, why join in? That would make your behavior just as bad as mine. Except I was actually responding to you, which makes your contrarianism "for the sake of it" worse. But I get it, reading comprehension is hard.

1