Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

formerlyanonymous_ t1_ivxomso wrote

Quoting random COVID "science" studies counts as engagement, doesn't it?

14

ProLibertateCH t1_ivz3qv0 wrote

You mean ACCURATE studies published in major journals that showed problems with the “vaccines”? Are you that far behind?

−4

formerlyanonymous_ t1_ivz5dvm wrote

I'm all encompassing. Feel like lots of people engaged in LOTS of scientific papers, both of high and dubious quality.

4

cazique t1_ivzwozg wrote

If you read the article and the questions asked on the underlying survey (linked within the article), there is no differentiation. It's more about topics that concern the respondent.

2

ProLibertateCH t1_iw0ok7j wrote

I was asking formerlyanonymous_ about his dumb comment. What he's saying is:
"if people quote scientific studies on a topic I have been thoroughly brainwashed about, then those studies don't count as 'science'".

−1

Expandexplorelive t1_iw5dl05 wrote

The numerous studies that showed the vaccines were effective against severe illness are all fake, right?

0