Well, words have the meaning you want them to have. When liberals (in the classic non-american meaning) say they want an open free market what they really mean is a market unregulated enough for maximum capital reproduction and regulated enough so the goverment can help with some more profit. So usually that's what I mean by free market.

And if you are not joking, you are reproducing the schrodinger's socialism falacy: when something works in China it's because it's capitalist; when it fails it's because China's communist (neither are true. China's socialist). China not having a massive monopoly as Amazon is consequence of it's own historical development, which went in the opposit direction of the liberal economic canons, not because it succeded at implementing a capitalist vision of free market.

"which is the foundation of any vibrant economy": this was brought to you by the Washington Consensus gang.