Submitted by chasepsu t3_zbrgwh in dataisbeautiful
Comments
sandboxlollipop t1_iyszsqa wrote
It's fascinating. I have no idea what each of the teams are or know anything about American Football at that, but it really is interesting to see all the movement
Odd_Egg_1496 t1_iytsw86 wrote
All you gotta know is the Vols absolutely BLEW IT against South Carolina
t-sme t1_iz7fg23 wrote
In the AP poll most of the movement is simply, X team lost so they move down in the rankings and other teams move up
The CFP ranking is more likely to actually evaluate whether a team should actually be ranked where it is
Krogsly t1_iyv76qz wrote
This format does provide us with a beginning assumption that the AP/CFP are more accurate at assessing the talent/performance of the top 5 teams than the rest of the field.
chasepsu OP t1_iyx3iq0 wrote
I also look at the wild changes from Weeks 2 to 4 as an indication that preseason and even early season rankings are dumb.
teamongered t1_iyukq6d wrote
The figure is a bit hard to read. Looks like a spiderweb. I’d suggest try visualizing in a way that provides more continuity.
supreme2005 t1_iz06hq9 wrote
Pretty amazing what TCU accomplished honestly
[deleted] t1_iystjzy wrote
[removed]
artaig t1_iytw54b wrote
Go Lions! Wait, this is not their league...
Wide-Persimmon5259 t1_iyxd999 wrote
The fact AF have rankings for college teams genuinely blows my mind
chasepsu OP t1_iysqzb7 wrote
This was made using PowerPoint. I utilized the AP Poll rankings for Preseason through Week 9 and the College Football Playoff rankings for Weeks 10-14. I don’t like changing sources midway through the year, but there’s no CFP ranking before week 10 and it’s the only one that “matters” starting that week. I’ve personally found the AP Poll to be more authoritative than the Coaches Poll, which is why I chose to use that for the first 10 weeks.
I’m aware that this chart is extremely busy, and would appreciate any suggestions folks might have on how to make it more readable.