Comments
Boris_Ignatievich t1_iyta449 wrote
The early 60s was when the back 4 became prevalent as a tactic, rather than the wm or variations thereof, so my suspicion is that's driven the change, but I might be forgetting another factor
[deleted] t1_iytbnt8 wrote
[removed]
Tiken139 t1_iytk51l wrote
Agreed, if you read the book “inverting the pyramid: history of soccer tactics” Brazil’s 4-2-4 in 58 WC inspired most to play 4 back, and Soviets started to play 4-4-2 as early as mid 60’s
GigaFastTwin t1_iytmyhr wrote
2.5 goals/game to date for 2022
RangeWilson t1_iyu5n4g wrote
- Pack the box
- Hope your striker can create something
- ???????
- Profit
Last-Caterpillar-112 t1_iyuoqej wrote
It would have been very satisfying if the offside rule had been implemented at that time - would explain the graph. But no, that was already in place.
SonofaCuntLicknBitch t1_iyuoy6c wrote
Obviously world cup goals per game and world fertility rates are closely related. Call the press
pluslinus t1_iyuzou0 wrote
Is it good? I’ve been thinking about gifting it my dad for christmas, he’s very into tactics
burns_after_reading t1_iyv27qe wrote
The NBA could fix this real quick.
Only1Goose t1_iyv2zs0 wrote
It’s good but it focuses more on pre 2000’s tactics. If you want to read more about modern tactics I recommend Zonal marking.
Boris_Ignatievich t1_iyv7rnf wrote
It's very good - I've only read the first edition that stops around 2008 with Spallettis striker less Roma side, so can't comment on the newer editions and how they handle the rise of tiki taka etc, but the historic stuff is excellent
pluslinus t1_iyv91pq wrote
Thank you very much!
ikashnitsky OP t1_iywe07r wrote
Thanks. I guess, you meant x axis? Grey background is just aesthetics, but it does help to read very light colors.
ikashnitsky OP t1_iysx362 wrote
R code to replicate: https://github.com/ikashnitsky/tidy-tuesday/blob/master/2022-48-world-cups/world-cups.R