Submitted by Populationdemography t3_105uomv in dataisbeautiful
Comments
Populationdemography OP t1_j3cupr8 wrote
Ukraine and Russia number of births, 1962–2021
Sources: Ukrstat; Rosstat
Made with ms Excel instruments
SlowCrates t1_j3d61hr wrote
I would be willing to help those numbers go up.
iwery t1_j3e0dor wrote
Post your picture and other important data, the special committee will decide whether you qualify.
[deleted] t1_j3cxoag wrote
[removed]
Relevant-Season1995 t1_j3cz066 wrote
I can understand why Russia's fell in the early 90s, but why so quickly since 2016?
iohognbdfh t1_j3d02mk wrote
I'm sure there are multiple factors, but you already mentioned the obvious one. 1990 and 2016 are 26 years apart.. in other words a generation apart. Less babies today because there's less women in their child bearing years today due to the drop in births from the previous generation. Generations echo across time. In the same way that millennials in the US are the largest generation because they echo the baby boom.
_CHIFFRE t1_j3gukgt wrote
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Russian_financial_crisis_(2014%E2%80%932016)
i think that plays a part, it was a huge financial crisis due to oil price crash, price crash for some other commodities that Russia exports, sanctions due to Crimea annexation etc.
[deleted] t1_j3drbgy wrote
[removed]
Composer-Fragrant t1_j3gnrf1 wrote
Fertility rates would make way more sense to compare, the graph currently gives very little actual insight. However still not sure what the point is.
glmory t1_j3ik3oy wrote
Total births is a better number. You don’t supply an army from your birthrate, you supply it from the number of babies who were born a few decades ago.
Composer-Fragrant t1_j3ktiu8 wrote
If you want to compare the size of their armies or reserve, you could do that without a time series, as a gross number or percentage of population. If you want to compare the development of fertility over time, potentially as a cause of events, as well as being able to compare this development between nations of different population, fertility rates is the way to go.
iohognbdfh t1_j3cxbzd wrote
Not to state the obvious, but Ukraine (in its modern form) didn't exist until 1991.
SillyBanana123 t1_j3cz3q5 wrote
Neither did Russia, but they were republics within the USSR. Whether or not Ukraine was independent or not doesn’t change the fact that they recorded demographic information
iohognbdfh t1_j3d0w8f wrote
The point is what is this graph even trying to represent?
nikshdev t1_j3dvclf wrote
Births recorded on the territories that are now Russia and Ukraine.
iohognbdfh t1_j3dvjm6 wrote
Obviously, but I'm asking what's the agenda here?
iwery t1_j3e06y2 wrote
I second the question.
False-Persimmon-8461 t1_j3g2w74 wrote
Interesting. Ukraine population is 3.4x less than Russia’s. But births last year are 5x less (!) according to the chart…