Submitted by off-and-on t3_11aniop in explainlikeimfive
SoulWager t1_j9t0mr2 wrote
The cold part means you don't need ridiculously high temperatures to get it to happen, it does not describe the outcome of the reaction.
Think of it more like autoignition temperature, rather than flame temperature. There are substances that will ignite by themselves at room temperature, but they still produce heat when burned. Fusion is a lot harder though, while there are ways to make it happen at reduced temperatures, like replacing the electrons with bosons muons, we don't quite know how to do that in a way that's practical for power generation.
dirschau t1_j9t9a3y wrote
Just to check, did you mean muons or did you actually mean bosons, in which case please elaborate or link something that talks about it, because I've never heard of that one
Timstro59 t1_j9tfoar wrote
I think they're referring to muon catalyzed fusion. It's considered impractical due to the high cost of muon sources and the relatively short life span of the particle itself.
dirschau t1_j9tglkc wrote
Yeah, that's why I'm checking what they mean. I already know of muon catalysation, but who knows, maybe someone figured out how to use Pi- mesons intead of electrons
SoulWager t1_j9uic2v wrote
Yes, I meant muons. whoops.
dirschau t1_j9w5v77 wrote
Alright, nevermind then
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments