Indictment is just when the prosecutors file the charges against the person. Arraignment is when the person goes in front of the judge to either enter his or her plea of guilty, not guilty, no contest or to confirm the plea deal arranged between the prosecutors and defense.
Can I press more: I guess we use charge and indictment interchangeably, then, to essentially mean the paper versus the presentation of them? Am I in the ballpark?
Indictment is more the formal process of filing charges. When the prosecutors believe they have sufficient evidence to support them in court. They can enlist a grand jury to decide if there is enough evidence to warrant it before hand, but all the grand jury looks for is if they believe there is enough evidence to go to trial, usually used in what expected to be high profile cases not always used.
Arraignment is the formal procedure for the defendant to enter his plea with the judge.
Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):
Straightforward or factual queries are not allowed on ELI5. ELI5 is meant for simplifying complex concepts.
If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.
ken120 t1_jee8c4f wrote
Indictment is just when the prosecutors file the charges against the person. Arraignment is when the person goes in front of the judge to either enter his or her plea of guilty, not guilty, no contest or to confirm the plea deal arranged between the prosecutors and defense.