Because "cancel culture" only exists insofar as the general public stops consuming the content in question.

Some random actor says the N-word in a hateful way: "oh no we need to address this quickly before consumers stop watching our show or network as a whole because we support actors like this." - cancelled

Randy Marsh says the N-word: "oh hey look at that, this is one of the most watched episodes of all time and we have no financial reason to address this in any way." - not cancelled.

South Park is a show known for its edgy humor and pushing boundaries. It has been around for a long time, and its creators, Trey Parker and Matt Stone, have built a reputation for making fun of everyone and everything. This has given the show a kind of immunity to cancel culture because people expect South Park to be offensive and controversial. It's seen as satire, which can make it harder for people to take it too seriously or hold it to the same standards as other shows.

​

I personally think it's refreshing.

A lot of censorship is really self-imposed. When someone really doesn’t care what a small group of people complain about then there isn’t much that can be done to make them change their ways.

Similarly you could say Fox News is immune to cancel culture, because they’re happy to go on doing what they do no matter how much the progressive left despise them for it

[removed]

They are one of the few examples of dark humor done well, they do satire perfectly. And they make fun of absolutely everything, so they aren't only targeting marginalized groups in an attempt to hide real racist / homophobic / transphobic / etc thoughts masked as jokes.

The disclaimer in the beginning says it shouldn’t be viewed by anyone so basically it’s your fault for watching it in the first place.

[deleted]

[removed]

When it comes to "cancel culture," most of the people doing the cancelling/boycotting are people who weren't consuming it, anyway. It's only a real problem for the person/act/show being cancelled when they get fired/lose their contracts, which only happens in instances where publishers/producers market to a wide-ranging audience and they're afraid that the cancelling/boycott will hurt their sales, like when Paula Deen lost book deals in 2013 because she admitted to using the N-word in the 80s. Her publisher didn't just publish her books, they also published things that pretty much covered anything and everything you could think of, and they decided there was a very real risk to losing more money to the impending boycott than they'd lose by not paying the publishing costs and just cutting her lose.

In South Park's case, the network knows full well what South Park is, as does their audience, and the show makes it obvious right up front that they're likely going to offend you. They took some real risks with the Scientology and Book of Mormon episodes, but the network itself is pretty well insulated from most of whatever legal action anyone can take (and Stone and Parker like it that way). Therefore, anyone getting upset at whatever they see there (and South Park has offended me more times than I can count, but I still watch it) have only themselves to blame for watching it in the first place, because that disclaimer at the beginning makes it clear that, "hey, we warned you." As a result, South Park doesn't lose a lot of viewers due to controversy.

Please read this entire message

Your submission has been removed for the following reason(s):

Subjective or speculative replies are not allowed on ELI5. Only objective explanations are permitted here; your question is asking for speculation or subjective responses. This includes anything asking for peoples' subjective opinions, any kind of discussion, and anything where we would have to speculate on the answer. This very much includes asking about motivations of people or companies. This includes Just-so stories.

If you would like this removal reviewed, please read the detailed rules first. If you believe this submission was removed erroneously, please use this form and we will review your submission.

South Park has never really been my cup of tea, but I think the big reason is, it’s funny and it’s clearly satirical. They’ve also built up a lot of goodwill with different factions because they’ve ‘offended’ everyone over the years, so in a weird way it’s seen as operating in good faith.

I also think it’s worth noting that most comedians or comedy acts that have gotten ‘cancelled’ have happened when they’ve veered too far away from “funny jokes” and towards “mean spirited attacks”.