Yancy_Farnesworth t1_iu4q3pv wrote
Reply to comment by johnnymacmax in ELI5: Does a nuclear explosion make other atoms radioactive or simply contaminates it? by Sklifosovsky20
Neutrons attach to atomic nuclei and transform them into other elements by literally slamming into the nucleus. It's not really about convenience, even a 0.00001% chance of a neutron hitting an atom just right to transform it is inevitable when we talk about the number of atoms in a given volume. The molar mass for atmospheric oxygen (2 oxygen atoms) is about 32 grams. 6 x 10^23 molecules of O2 weighs 32 grams. There's a lot of atoms around a nuclear explosion taking place on earth.
Any atom can be radioactive, they do not need to be heavy. Tritium for example is a radioactive form of hydrogen with 2 neutrons. Hydrogen is stable and not radioactive with 1 or 2 neutrons. There's generally a ratio between neutrons and protons (really simplifying this) where elements tend to be stable. Go outside of that ratio and the element tends to be unstable and will decay into something else. The why is related to quantum mechanics.
BillWoods6 t1_iu5640k wrote
> Hydrogen is stable and not radioactive with 1 or 2 neutrons.
You meant 0 or 1 neutrons.
Sklifosovsky20 OP t1_iu5l2jp wrote
Why would a neutron get stuck in the nucleus instead of bouncing off?
SchiferlED t1_iu6cjvs wrote
Neutrons don't have an electric charge, so they are not repelled by the negative electrons around the atom, or the positive protons in the nucleus. The strong nuclear force (which is much stronger than other forces, hence the name) holds protons and neutrons together in the nucleus, and keeps the new neutron there instead of it "bouncing" off.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments