Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

GeneSaw t1_iuhem59 wrote

You're saying it like it's bad thing. There is a reason why every Call of Duty has sold so well. People like simpler things. The more complicated games always have a smaller playerbase. But that of course doesn't mean one is better than the other because how popular it is. Re:verse is just more easily accessible and has more room to grow.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iuhew08 wrote

You do know most people don't play free for all in call of duty right? Plus not to mention that modern call of duty is made to be multiplayer. Re:Verse reuses the engine of a single player game. It has room to grow sure but it'd be better if they just remade the game entirely so it didn't play like ass.

1

GeneSaw t1_iuhf8wj wrote

Even in Team Deathmatch or Domination the basic principle is only to go in and shoot what you see. It's simple and people like it for it. And I personally don't see why Re:verse "plays like ass". I personally think the over-the-shoulder works just fine in pvp too.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iuhfnyp wrote

It's not it being over the shoulder, it's the gameplay. Go play one match of fortnite (yes haha fortnite bad) and tell me that Re:Verse has good third person shooting in comparison. Because it absolutely doesn't.

1

GeneSaw t1_iuhfrn1 wrote

Don't know what to say. I don't mind it. You clearly do. That's a shame.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iuhfxzp wrote

It's cool that you don't mind it but the game is rough. If you can't see that then you've just been brainwashed. You can like something but don't act like it's better than it is.

−1

GeneSaw t1_iuhg7by wrote

So I'm brainwashed since my opinion differs from yours? I would say that's rich but sadly it's just the common practice for ignorant plebs, it seems.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iuhvew7 wrote

No you're brainwashed because you refuse to see obvious flaws. It's like how pokemon fans don't see how bad the series is compared to most other rpgs out there.

−1

GeneSaw t1_iuhvnwb wrote

They are obvious flaws to you, not to me. So you are ignorant to the fact that your opinion is not an actual fact but just something you see as right. My opinion is just as valid as yours.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iuhy0aj wrote

Just because someone likes mayo on a cake doesn't make it good, just good to them.

0

GeneSaw t1_iui2d8c wrote

You seem to be under the impression that there are definite answers to these questions. Like is something good. For someone it is, for someone it isn't. Neither is no more right than the other. That's why they are called opinions.

1

DevastaTheSeeker OP t1_iui5dux wrote

There are definite answers. I literally just used an example of something that someone in the world considers to be "good" that is not good.

I like the game Dark Cloud but the weapon durability system is a flaw because it destroys your weapon that you have been using for the entire game.

This is a fact. It is not an opinion.

Someone may like that it adds more value to your weapons in the game but the vast majority will say that it was a bad design choice to make the weapon you spend the whole game upgrading disappear. Which is why they changed it in the sequel along with cutting the amount of playable characters down to 2 to make it more sreamlined.

You see how I can point out objective flaws in the game that I consider to be my favourite despite it being my favourite game?

0

GeneSaw t1_iui7lmp wrote

I knew you would try to bring the majority thing into this. That changes nothing. There used to be a time when majority of people "knew for a fact" that the world was flat. Remind me, how did that turn out, exactly? Mind you, some people still think that (I'm guessing you're one of them based on your ignorant views) but there are actual proof of that not being so. Can you point me a proof that mayo on a cake is not good? Other than you and likely many others just say so?

And if you want to bring Dark Cloud into this, I personally preferred the first one and thought the sequel wad kinda meh. But that, again, is my opinion on the matter. Doesn't make it a fact.

1