Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

call_of_mischief t1_iyefz1x wrote

Reply to comment by C64hrles in 12 year old could have made better designs by Hexxegone

Id rank them 1,5,4,2,3,7,6,9,8

1

C64hrles t1_iyez24u wrote

Gen 1 starters are cool, but honestly without the gen 1 watercolor art they would be no where near as cool. Imagine a reality where the gen1 starters got no mega. Would you really like them as much?

1

call_of_mischief t1_iyf2fn9 wrote

Yeah? I liked them before the megas and honestly i dont really care about them

Mega Venusaur is okay mega blastoise is meh mega charizard y is really cool and x sucks

2

C64hrles t1_iyf5qke wrote

I mean im not going to tell you no if you really like them. I just think the water color carries there designs. Because on their own their very plain. 3d models were not kind to them

1

call_of_mischief t1_iyf85rs wrote

Yeah i mean most pokemons look worse in 3d than in sprite or their official arts thats just because gamefreak suck

1

C64hrles t1_iyfddef wrote

Fair. But even then id argue they got the gen 6 and 7 starters lookin decent

1

call_of_mischief t1_iyfeir7 wrote

Lets see them

Gen 6: fire furry bait, water cool frog, grass ?????Ball?????????

Gen 7: fire furry bait, water lamest pokemon who care about him, grass edgy archer owl not too bad

1