Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

TagalogON t1_je6xny2 wrote

Hey, sometimes TWS earbuds using the newer (Qualcomm/Airoha/etc.) chipsets are opting for the more powerful ones (the new chipset are usually more efficient with the battery life, so it's just the manufacturers opting to have better performance instead of battery life) and so this can drain the battery more.

Oh and make sure they're using the same codec. Usually LDAC will drain the battery a lot (and add more latency), and so you can just use AptX Adaptive or regular AptX as not a lot of people can tell the differences.

Check Scarbir's website, regancipher's Head-Fi and Youtube reviews, /r/Earbuds, etc. for the new budget TWS earbuds or best value.

Info about UTWS3/5 battery life (5-7 hours) and also TWS earbuds volume variability: https://www.reddit.com/r/headphones/comments/10yr7js/finaly_good_audio_on_the_go_utws5_and_fh5s/j803bbw/

Latency with TWS earbuds, TWS adapters, Bluetooth 5.3 LC3 tech, et cetera: https://www.reddit.com/r/HeadphoneAdvice/comments/11pa48l/wireless_gaming_earbuds_for_pc_gaming/jbx09oi/

Wired IEMs with TWS adapters (like FiiO UTWS3/5, KZ AZ09 Pro, etc.): https://www.reddit.com/r/HeadphoneAdvice/comments/125a33h/upgrading_my_xm4s_wireless_iem_advice/je3kulz/

2

ma3oony OP t1_je76u03 wrote

my earbuds are from HTC, they're authentic and as a call quality vs noise, it beat soundpeats free2classic and belkin soundform play , but as for volume htc is below them , anyways i added the models in ,y thread, and i bought both of them to test out and the summary is what i listed in the thread, both are acceptable, so it's either 5.3 with fast charging , a bit louder and lower battery , or 5.1 with huge battery but without fast charging and a bit lower audio, or return both and risk with new experiment lol

1