Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

whatevsmang t1_j0ohsru wrote

I like it. I don't know why suddenly Chu become some kind of pariah or shit, it's still good.

16

GeologistUnfair t1_j0qcb7k wrote

Because everybody already owns it and so now the companies and the YouTubers don't make any more money if they keep saying nice things about it. So it's the zero.

And two or three months it will be something else and everybody will say how the zero is overrated.

This will happen repeatedly until this hobby becomes a little less prone to hype cycles.

10

whatevsmang t1_j0qjhes wrote

Don't worry. The only winner in this game is Crinacle.

7

Matasa89 t1_j0p8n0k wrote

I like it, it's just a bit sad that the cable is so bad and can't be replaced. Many other cheap IEMs have decent cables, and they're replaceable too.

7

whatevsmang t1_j0p8xtb wrote

That I cannot argue. To support OP, if you you have to pick between Chu or Salnotes Zero, Zero is the objectively better option with simply for its detachable cable. But there's no reason to get Zero if you already got a Chu since signature wise they're sound so similar.

3

Matasa89 t1_j0pc16r wrote

Well there's also the size. The Chu is nice and small, while the Salnotes Zero is freaking massive. I've used the Truthear Zero and it is nice in sound and punchy, but the fit is just... it hurts my ears.

5