Submitted by egg_static5 t3_11l0wd5 in history
Comments
CountAurelian t1_jbbdrkn wrote
Am I misreading this? The Romans had been in North Africa since the Punic Wars. Literally the most famous era of Roman history ends with dominion over Egypt years before Claudius.
NuffNuffNuff t1_jbbgjz2 wrote
It's worded incorectly, he extended Roman rule IN North Africa, not INTO North Africa. (He annexed Mauretania)
CountAurelian t1_jbbhmv6 wrote
That makes a lot more sense. Thanks!
[deleted] t1_jbbikns wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbboqsz wrote
[removed]
Da_Iron_Lung t1_jbbr1gf wrote
Imagine all the stuff still under sand that we don't even know about.. It blows my mind to think of the lost cities below the sand
[deleted] t1_jbbrhlp wrote
[removed]
ExRockstar t1_jbbs9nf wrote
It's from the 6,000 year old Giza gift shop
[deleted] t1_jbbvse2 wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbc2xhh wrote
[removed]
sokoe t1_jbc32f6 wrote
You know about the Khufu ship? They found it in 1954 in a pit at the foot of the great pyramid https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Khufu_ship?wprov=sfti1 https://maps.apple.com/?ll=29.978056,31.134444&q=Khufu%20ship
Raiden115X t1_jbc5nf2 wrote
And the nose was also damaged coincidentally?
mateww t1_jbc6fs5 wrote
Must be that alien ship they used to build them.
But seriously, first hearing of this. Got to do some researching
GonWithTheNen t1_jbc6udo wrote
Funny how that always seems to happen, innit?
3ayzamout t1_jbcacfc wrote
get out of here afrocentrist
dragowall t1_jbcbukg wrote
Almost as if small parts or arms that stick out are more prone to be damaged...Really makes you think...
dtr1002 t1_jbcdh9k wrote
Let alone all the formerly coastal stuff lost after sea level rise.
[deleted] t1_jbcebqx wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbcejzk wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbcffmt wrote
[removed]
artfulpain t1_jbci369 wrote
Smells like you know what you're talking about.
TylerDurden626 t1_jbcikfj wrote
That’s usually what happens when you don’t build part of a structure well enough.
Lurker_IV t1_jbcrg1x wrote
I don't see any water weathering on that sphinx enclosure. That disproves all the sphinx is super old theories!
Science!
Stock_Regular8696 t1_jbcrpxp wrote
I am still waiting for the Star Gate to be uncovered.
lookingfordriver t1_jbcs6gh wrote
Here's an awesome lecture by Bob Brier on the Khufu ship
Raiden115X t1_jbct0o0 wrote
I don't know what that is.
lawyerjsd t1_jbczqir wrote
Neat fact: Egypt was the personal property of the Roman emperor. Not part of Rome, but his personal property.
VK4LOL t1_jbd017h wrote
Anyone else see an uncanny resemblance to Micheal Jackson??
DaddyCatALSO t1_jbd0fr8 wrote
The governor of egypt had a unique title, not one of the other two used elsewhere in the empire
[deleted] t1_jbd1y02 wrote
[removed]
DocMcCall t1_jbd3k5w wrote
Boy, just can't get an intact nose on one of those
Potato128 t1_jbd4tqs wrote
Last Weekend, I saw a few archaeologists in the high street brushing sand off their statues too.............this is Egyypt Government PR to entice (lure) Tourist to visit.....
Who do they think they're trying to kid ?
CCHS_Band_Geek t1_jbd75n5 wrote
Sand is the water of land, the deserts an ocean
CCHS_Band_Geek t1_jbd7bmf wrote
This is obviously a shady move by Big Ant to cover up their HQs. I’m not buyin it.
CCHS_Band_Geek t1_jbd7g9q wrote
Whole_Skill_259 t1_jbd9z2q wrote
What were these most of these statues that have been buried made out of? To have something last this long is amazing
truteamplaya t1_jbdfskb wrote
Even the U.S. Census Bureau doesn’t count Egypt as an African (Melanated People) any longer smdh
Bluedev7 t1_jbdk4uk wrote
Yep just like the others. They "accidentally" were broken or damaged when the Europeans were trying to fill their museums
Ex-Machina1980s t1_jbdkwyl wrote
I always think about this! The same with the sea too
SupLord t1_jbdna79 wrote
If anyones wondering why so many discoveries lately, the whole country is under construction building their new capital. I’ve never seen so much construction in my life.
MaxillaryOvipositor t1_jbdvn9o wrote
Stone. It tends to last a while.
Myfourcats1 t1_jbe08ib wrote
Not just in Egypt too. What happened to Punt? How about the Kushites? These were powerful people who traded with and fought with Egypt. We’ve got some stuff in Sudan and Somalia but how much more is out there?
[deleted] t1_jbe8n0g wrote
[removed]
[deleted] t1_jbe8zjj wrote
[removed]
onyxblade42 t1_jbedgtv wrote
What does that have to do with this?
3ayzamout t1_jbehocs wrote
what are you implying that the nose was damaged? whenever someone says that they usually claim that these people werent our ancestors and we broke it to hide that they were african
3ayzamout t1_jbei786 wrote
because we never was you're brainwashed
arnold001 t1_jbeiarv wrote
What I cannot understand is how is it possible they are burried?! I mean, if continents move or if there are sudden earthquakes or floods then ok sure, like there are some things that are in the sea. But so so many artefacts seem to just have been burried.
Raiden115X t1_jbejkcy wrote
As an Irish Mexican descendant, born in California, raised in Texas, I have never heard such a theory. I just thought it seemed odd that most sphinx noses are usually damaged.
When you say "our ancestors", I don't know who you're referring to. I think you might be assuming I know far more about you than is possible from your immediately defensive remark.
3ayzamout t1_jbelu1l wrote
oh okay sorry for assuming its just i hear this alot ftom afrocentrists and they get on my nerves and by our ancestors i obv mean ancient egyptians cuz im egyptian and thats what the post is about
[deleted] t1_jbennvt wrote
[deleted] t1_jbenup1 wrote
[removed]
rtb001 t1_jbeo96z wrote
I believe the governor had to be of equestrian real, because the emperor didn't want a senator to oversee Egypt and potentially build a power base there.
Supposedly senators were not even allowed to VISIT Egypt, let alone govern it, such was its importance.
B1ueEyesWh1teDragon t1_jbestvi wrote
If I recall correctly from the History of Rome podcast, Egypt was the richest Roman province and also supplied a majority of the food to the empire as well. So it makes perfect sense to not have a third party like a senator govern it if you’re the emperor. That’s begging for rebellion.
Welshhoppo t1_jbesyhw wrote
That's because the last time a senator was in Egypt. That was Mark Antony.
We think it's one of the reasons Germanicus was done in by Tiberius. Because he was a popular senator who went to Egypt without permission.
FluphyBunny t1_jbez6i3 wrote
Just go on Facebook. Some nutters think it already has 😁
[deleted] t1_jbezdiv wrote
[removed]
FluphyBunny t1_jbezjwd wrote
Oh wow I have had conversations with people like that. Archaeology and even geology are witchcraft to them !
rtb001 t1_jbf181l wrote
It wasn't just Egypt, although Egypt was particularly key to the Emperor. Most Roman provinces were also not given to the senate to appoint a governor. Only a small subset of centrally located provinces along Italy itself and the Mediterranean were called "senatorial provinces". The key frontier provinces, where most of the troops are (Britain, Danube, Rhine, Syria etc) were imperial provinces, where the Emperor directly appointed governors, again to make sure only the people he trusts are given military commands.
rtb001 t1_jbf3uj2 wrote
Although if Tiberius really did assassinate Germanicus, he would have done it whether Germanicus set foot in Egypt or not. Not only was Germanicus more popular than Tiberius's own son Drusus, he also has closer bloodline to Augustus himself, being the grandson of Augustus' sister Octavia.
Welshhoppo t1_jbfata4 wrote
Considering how little Tiberius seems to have wanted to be Emperor, I put the entire blame of his death on Piso.
Smrtihara t1_jbfsi2k wrote
Did.. you just send me to yahoo news..?
panckage t1_jbh9gta wrote
People generally live in flood pains (where rivers meet the ocean). These rivers bring in silt and things eventually get buried over long periods of time. Just like lakes eventually fill up with silt and become land again.
In the end it is just high parts of the Earth (eg mountains) eroding and the silt piles up in the lower places... Making high places lower and lower places higher
panckage t1_jbha89e wrote
Partly but much is historical vandalism. If the new emperor didn't like the previous emperor, they often had their likenesses smashed.
dragowall t1_jbhky3p wrote
Completely forgot that the romans would ofen destroy the noses, would make sense if it is actually representing Claudius. But yeah, could be any of them, wear and tear from time/location it was buried or because it was Claudius
egg_static5 OP t1_jb9sdbe wrote
Emperor Claudius, whom archaeologists believe the statue's smiling features may belong to, extended Roman rule into North Africa between 41 and 54 AD.