This article has me scratching my head. It’s clear they are pushing an agenda with the comment “With megacities such as Beijing and New Delhi experiencing levels of air pollution similar to those of 19th-century London,” but that’s fine, no issue, everyone has an agenda.

The last sentence, though….trying to redefine Impressionism (very crudely and inadequately btw), I do take issue with.

“Turner and Monet likely intended to represent environmental change.” 🤔