Submitted by MagicRaptor t3_xwxaqx in history
MagicRaptor OP t1_irb7rro wrote
Reply to comment by buteo51 in Where did the English language REALLY come from? by MagicRaptor
Thanks for writing all that up, I really appreciate it. I remember reading some other theory (I wish I could remember the author) that stated a similar theory to Oosthuizen, which is that some form of embryonic precursor to Old English was introduced to Britain by the Belgae before the Romans even arrived, and that it followed a similar trajectory to the one you suggest. It lied in wait, evolved as a trade language, and then erupted across Britain as North Sea trade overtook Channel trade, eventually becoming the primary language of the mercantile class before spreading both upwards and downwards to the elites and the peasants, respectively. What's strange though is that if it was a trade language, why did it only emerge and gain traction in Britain, and not across the entire North Sea?
buteo51 t1_irbcwuc wrote
>What's strange though is that if it was a trade language, why did it only emerge and gain traction in Britain, and not across the entire North Sea?
This is a really good question, and as far as I know it isn't one that migration-skeptical scholars have a good answer for.
You could also ask it in the other direction though. If Old English came from continental Europe, why didn't any remnant of it survive there? It can't really be that all the people who spoke Old English migrated from the continent to Britain, can it?
Early Medieval Britain is fascinating for the same reason that it can be so incredibly frustrating. There are so many mysteries.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments