Submitted by VoloNoscere t3_yppzbq in history
ADROSIDI t1_ivm8asw wrote
Reply to comment by ThePatio in Discovery of bronzes rewrites Italy’s Etruscan-Roman history by VoloNoscere
Thats true, and when Rome became and Empire they also controlled majority of the Mediterranean. I was just implying that cultural transitions are not as simple as first Etruscans, then Roman. There was in depth connectivity between cultures. Even within Italy itself, there was never a uniform Roman culture. Roman culture, as with most cultures, was extremely dynamic and was constantly influenced/influencing and integrated aspects of other cultures, even ones they annexed. The Etruscans did not become Roman, rather they culture was slowly integrated into the Roman cultural identity, with many aspects of Roman culture to have originated from foreign influence.
Edit: P.S I apologise for my long winded response. I am currently researching Etruscans relationship with Rome for uni, so I am quite passionate about this topic.
_PM_ME_PANGOLINS_ t1_ivnvgkr wrote
Yes. All we're doing is correcting OP who skipped hundreds of years ahead.
Hattarottattaan3 t1_ivpu6hn wrote
Let's not forget in fact other important cultures that didn't disappear all of a sudden, like ligures, samnites, oscan peoples, daunians, sicanians, greek city states of Magna Grecia... They didn't disappear all of a sudden at all
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments