Submitted by TurboTortois3 t3_zr3sct in history
Cristoff13 t1_j12pf96 wrote
Reply to comment by KarmaticIrony in Why didn't the US adopt the STG-44 after WW2? by TurboTortois3
Yet part of the definition of an assault rifle is it must be capable of selective fire. And the great majority of intermediate calibre rifles in military service still have selective fire. This despite most sources I've seen agreeing automatic fire is something the great majority of riflemen very rarely, if ever, use.
And the STG-44 wasn't a very well constructed rifle. It was almost a last ditch weapon, sacrificing longevity of service for ease of manufacture.
ParaglidingAssFungus t1_j1bteki wrote
That selective fire also includes 3 round burst rather than full auto, which is what most of the US Army’s M4s and M16s have.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments