Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

[deleted] t1_j1k2oha wrote

[removed]

−1

peteroh9 t1_j1ktzwu wrote

I think you may be living in a different timeline than I am.

3

wolfie379 t1_j1kv07n wrote

Standard practice. Have you ever heard anyone referring to Britain’s second longest serving monarch as Victoria I? No, because there has not yet been a Victoria II, so she is referred to as Queen Victoria. “The first” is only added when there is a need to distinguish them from “the second”.

4

peteroh9 t1_j1kvkl2 wrote

I'm surprised you've heard of Victoria if you had a King Charles II in 1860.

4