Litenpes t1_j3zzaoo wrote
Reply to comment by Roland_Bootykicker in Were muslim armies harder to maintain in the field? by DJacobAP
Excellent summary. One question, why couldn’t he pay them lika an ordrinary army? Or wouldn’t there be a money issue with an ordinary army as well?
Irichcrusader t1_j412fdv wrote
Armies eat through money like you wouldn't believe and before the rise of modern banking institutions, it was extremely difficult to raise funds for a protracted campaign. I don't know if Arab armies in this time differed much from Europeans in how they raised funds, but I can say that European rulers in the time of the Crusades had to go to extreme measures to get the necessary cash. This usually involved selling or loaning out their land to monasteries for a set number of years, selling titles, taking loans from Jewish moneylenders (or outright stealing it) and gathering whatever they could through new taxes. Even then, most Crusaders who came back alive tended to be near penniless.
ThoDanII t1_j40ir4u wrote
Paying an ordinary army with money was the exception, not the rule
amitym t1_j404k16 wrote
They are saying that there was literally nothing to pay with. No cash.
Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments