Comments

You must log in or register to comment.

moobycow t1_itbj6ta wrote

It's all so fucking obvious. Traffic is caused by freeways having more capacity than can reasonably exit/enter from local roads. Adding more freeway does fuckall to fix this.

There is no fix for this other than alternatives to cars because they take up so much damn space.

3

HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itbyx36 wrote

Yet, we have Fulop and the state pushing through a freeway expansion instead of redirecting those funds to build more PATH tracks

0

moobycow t1_itbzd94 wrote

Fulop is 100% against it.

5

HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itc03uz wrote

Then heads should be rolling to stop it. He says he's against, but what is he doing?

0

moobycow t1_itc55fi wrote

What do you suggest he should be doing? It's not his call, he can't wave a magic wand and stop it.

He will be part of the inevitable lawsuits.

4

HappyArtichoke7729 OP t1_itc9xld wrote

He should be contacting the state government daily until it gets canceled, or until he gets a formal written rejection.

He should be investigating, or having his team investigate, and publicly disclose who is benefiting financially from this misguided deal, uncovering the corruption, and publishing it officially.

This is what REAL LEADERSHIP would look like on the ground.

0

genius96 t1_ith5m7a wrote

Yes, the mayor of the second largest city in the state should spend all his time calling the state and investigating. Projects like these can be held up in lawsuits, if Fulop doesn't sign on to the lawsuit, then you'd be correct.

1

Basilone1917 t1_itcoz1n wrote

Hypothetically, running for Governor in 2025 so he can stop it then.

2