Viewing a single comment thread. View all comments

PianistInformal4967 t1_je4qmob wrote

Question in case you know because the article doesn’t say: Was he (breaking the law) committing adultery at the workplace or during work hours (On the Public’s dime)?

That would make the most sense for why he was relieved from duty.

2

George_GeorgeGlass t1_je5fih6 wrote

And a “domestic incident” that required LE response. That’s the actual problem here. It’s not an affair. Given that information, I don’t have w problem with this decision

2

PianistInformal4967 t1_je5g2ib wrote

Yes he embarrassed his police department, caught a public complaint and caused state police interference and investigation. No police department wants any of that let alone from its own chief.

2

Hoosac_Love OP t1_je4rh2w wrote

He was not doing anything sexual on the job Unfortunately the article this morning that revealed the long awaited reason for the termination was in a paywall so I could not post That is why I explain in the comments No ,nothing happened on the job

0